What doesn't work
Your core assumption—that a market exists simply because no one else is serving it—is completely unproven. You've provided zero evidence of demand despite multiple requests.
Your core assumption—that a market exists simply because no one else is serving it—is completely unproven. You've provided zero evidence of demand despite multiple requests.
The biggest risk is that you're building a solution for a problem that doesn't exist. The absence of competition likely signals an absence of a market, not an opportunity.
Why do you believe people will pay a premium for in-person training in a co-official language when abundant, cheaper, and more flexible online options exist in a language they already speak fluently (Spanish)?
his is a hypothesis, not a business. You have failed to provide a single piece of evidence that anyone wants to buy what you are selling. Without customers, there is nothing to discuss.
There is no moat because there is nothing to defend. If a market magically appeared, any local training company could copy this instantly.
You avoided every direct question about evidence and customer validation. That is not resilience; it's a refusal to face the fundamental risks of your business.
An in-person training business focused on hyper-local niches is, by definition, not scalable. Your model is built to stay small.